For Christmas I received an interesting present from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and suvenir51.ru my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.
Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.
There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.
He wants to broaden his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.
It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and systemcheck-wiki.de actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.
"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.
"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for devnew.judefly.com a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.
"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's build it ethically and fairly."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".
He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of growth."
A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a wide range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.
But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.
This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.
that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.
When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.
But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are better.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.
1
How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
Chau Towle edited this page 2025-02-04 13:39:46 +04:00