balsoft/ligo
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
4,527 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags 65 MiB
77fdb739b6
Commit Graph

198 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lesenechal Remi
080b25a3bd WIP: add test. still have two ECond implementation, none of them pass the test 2019-10-18 17:44:10 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
b721a19b00 WIP: add test. still have two ECond implementation, none of them pass the test 2019-10-18 14:32:58 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
c9bcfc3ab0 higher order function test, pass two closure one calling the other as function arg 2019-10-17 17:33:29 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
9f0b61659e we don't need to check for closures in function arguments 2019-10-17 17:18:10 +02:00
John David Pressman
0b8c0dad3f Add failing deep set removal test to contracts 2019-10-14 18:58:42 -05:00
John David Pressman
c4babe60d8 Merge branch 'dev' of gitlab.com:ligolang/ligo into feature/pascaligo-map-patch 2019-10-14 11:34:26 -07:00
John David Pressman
93b5a068b5 Add deep map patch test 2019-10-14 10:19:18 -07:00
Christian Rinderknecht
d7baebdb2f Merge branch 'feature/pascaligo-set-patch' into 'dev' 
[LIGO-127] Add set patch functionality to PascaLIGO

See merge request ligolang/ligo!127
 2019-10-12 20:35:14 +00:00
Tom Jack
b64f82dff7 Add failing test 2019-10-11 15:24:46 -05:00
John David Pressman
62377135c4 Add empty map patch test 2019-10-11 13:23:29 -07:00
Tom Jack
e672d10029 Expose tez mod tez, too 2019-10-11 14:54:22 -05:00
Tom Jack
d87d0aab73 Expose tez/tez division 2019-10-11 14:35:23 -05:00
John David Pressman
58b8e537e4 Merge branch 'dev' of gitlab.com:ligolang/ligo into feature/pascaligo-set-patch 2019-10-11 09:02:45 -07:00
John David Pressman
c181ec1cac Upload rough draft of map patch functionality with test 
Right now I'm concerned that the way this generates the code is inefficient, in particular this line:

`in ok @@ (access_path, key', value', loc)`

Since the comments [on my code for the set patch](https://gitlab.com/ligolang/ligo/merge_requests/127)
warned that repeated generation of the access path is a bad idea(?). In any case this does work, so
it's something I can improve on.
 2019-10-10 18:26:28 -07:00
John David Pressman
0de17f4b57 Add empty set patches, add test for empty set patches 2019-10-10 13:35:38 -07:00
John David Pressman
c82076281f Add test for set patch functionality 
Resolves LIGO-127
 2019-10-09 23:13:25 -07:00
Lesenechal Remi
d59cd771c9 fix unsupported deep_map assignements and remove. add tests 2019-10-09 11:54:48 +02:00
John David Pressman
88de350264 Add test for PascaLIGO remove syntax which appears to work 2019-10-08 11:54:49 -07:00
Christian Rinderknecht
6f414a8ad2 Merge branch 'feature/unsupported_ass_None' into 'dev' 
Feature/unsupported_ass_none

See merge request ligolang/ligo!118
 2019-10-07 16:31:19 +00:00
Lesenechal Remi
44767c4b8e Simplifier now emit CONCAT constant 2019-10-07 17:16:03 +02:00
Tom Jack
3a14ef26ef Simplify? 2019-10-07 16:54:28 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
08a3e08f57 add a new T_constant in ast_simplified and ast_typed 2019-10-07 16:54:28 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
4e333836cb ignore closure error in subexpression of argument 2019-10-03 15:36:06 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
6fbe43d28a Check for closure when applying a function and update tests 2019-10-02 18:31:15 +02:00
Lesenechal Remi
2840eb7414 Treat env element expression as deep_closure only if they are lambda 2019-10-02 18:31:15 +02:00
Rémi Lesenechal
6850d21650 Feature/ligo 100 map tests 2019-09-27 15:52:40 +00:00
Sander
5bcf3cae6e Refactor Ligodity parser to use shared parser. 2019-09-27 13:33:25 +00:00
Gabriel Alfour
ebf699cde7 Merge branch 'feature/failwith-typed' into 'dev' 
Feature/failwith typed

See merge request ligolang/ligo!98
 2019-09-26 20:25:46 +00:00
Tom Jack
6fc1b6430b Add a little bit of tez tests, fix cameligo lexer bug 2019-09-26 13:31:37 -05:00
galfour
7974469159 remove fail 2019-09-26 19:30:17 +02:00
galfour
08809f8a5d type failwith 2019-09-26 19:01:07 +02:00
galfour
e0e5228254 failwith test 2019-09-26 18:47:46 +02:00
Christian Rinderknecht
ca1471612f Merge branch 'pascaligo-tests' into 'dev' 
Add Pascaligo tests for not kwd, (commented out) procedure and for loop

See merge request ligolang/ligo!95
 2019-09-26 15:09:37 +00:00
Tom Jack
389cbdbded Hotfix: display errors, fix mystery fail 2019-09-26 06:01:09 -05:00
Tom Jack
8a96e38f04 More failure tests, fix mligo assert 2019-09-25 20:15:21 -05:00
galfour
e6ac10f0ce switch from tz to mtz 2019-09-24 14:29:18 +02:00
galfour
b6ee28d704 add map literals in cameligo 2019-09-24 13:54:34 +02:00
galfour
ac449d2cb3 test List.iter and List.map in cameligo 2019-09-24 10:54:14 +02:00
galfour
9c3c40c9ef add set fold 2019-09-24 00:26:39 +02:00
galfour
c4752c5935 add map fold 2019-09-23 23:46:47 +02:00
galfour
b41b676eb8 add list fold 2019-09-23 23:33:25 +02:00
galfour
fed4891840 Merge branch 'dev' into refactor/everything 2019-09-23 16:40:51 +02:00
galfour
37836f9512 adding option 2019-09-22 22:44:50 +02:00
galfour
9fb65e71e8 more lists 2019-09-21 11:30:41 +02:00
galfour
dc9294bbcc add options in cameligo 2019-09-20 20:38:04 +02:00
galfour
1b901b1c25 Merge branch 'dev' into refactor/everything 2019-09-20 17:50:47 +02:00
galfour
e3179bd7c7 tests pass again 2019-09-19 12:59:07 +02:00
galfour
d8b7a12c69 more refactoring 2019-09-15 13:12:19 +02:00