fix typos in the doc
This commit is contained in:
parent
d93d2a9b65
commit
66e78f4811
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ without code, so it is still necessary to pay for its small storage
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
tezos-client originate account alice_del for alice \
|
||||
transfering 1000 from alice \
|
||||
transferring 1000 from alice \
|
||||
--delegate bob
|
||||
|
||||
As done before, we originate a contract *alice_del* with manager
|
||||
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Running a delegate
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
A delegate is responsible for baking blocks, endorsing blocks and
|
||||
accusing other delegates in case their try to double bake or double
|
||||
accusing other delegates in case they try to double bake or double
|
||||
endorse.
|
||||
|
||||
In the network, rights for baking and endorsing are randomly assigned
|
||||
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ We can compute this maximum using the inverse of Cumulative
|
||||
Distribution Function of the Binomial where `most cases` is a value of
|
||||
confidence that we can put to 95%.
|
||||
There a simple `Python
|
||||
script<https://gitlab.com/paracetamolo/utils/blob/master/estimated-rights.py>`_
|
||||
script <https://gitlab.com/paracetamolo/utils/blob/master/estimated-rights.py>`_
|
||||
that does the computation for us and returns the deposits and rewards,
|
||||
expected and maximum, for a cycle and for `preserved_cycles`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ RPC interface
|
||||
|
||||
The only interface to the node is through Json RPC calls and it is disabled by
|
||||
default. A more detailed documentation can be found in the :ref:`RPC index.
|
||||
<rpc>` The RPC interface must be enable in order for the clients
|
||||
to communicate with the node, but is should not be publically accessible on the
|
||||
<rpc>` The RPC interface must be enabled in order for the clients
|
||||
to communicate with the node, but is should not be publicly accessible on the
|
||||
internet. With the following command it is available uniquely on the
|
||||
`localhost` address of your machine, on the default port ``8732``.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ signed by that account and enforces some good intuitive properties:
|
||||
and *n+1*, and *n* gets lost then *n+1* cannot be applied.
|
||||
|
||||
Additionally each operation needs to declare a gas and storage limit,
|
||||
if an operations consumes more than this limits it will fail.
|
||||
if an operation consumes more than these limits it will fail.
|
||||
Later we'll learn more about the gas and storage model.
|
||||
|
||||
Another interesting field of the receipts are the `balance updates`
|
||||
@ -347,10 +347,10 @@ Gas and storage cost model
|
||||
A quick look at the balance updates on the receipt shows that on top of
|
||||
funding the contract with 1ꜩ, *alice* was also charged an extra cost
|
||||
that is burnt.
|
||||
This cost comes from the *storage* and it's shown in the line
|
||||
This cost comes from the *storage* and is shown in the line
|
||||
``Paid storage size diff: 46 bytes``, 41 for the contract and 5 for
|
||||
the string ``"hello"``.
|
||||
Given that a contract saves it's data on the public block-chain that
|
||||
Given that a contract saves its data on the public block-chain that
|
||||
every node stores, it is necessary to charge a fee per byte to avoid
|
||||
abuse and encourage lean programs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ block and contract, you can call the associated RPC via the command :
|
||||
``$ tezos-admin-client rpc get
|
||||
/blocks/<block_id>/proto/context/contracts/<contract_id>/balance``.
|
||||
|
||||
A RPC may take an *input* and generates an *output* both in JSON
|
||||
An RPC may take an *input* and generate an *output* both in JSON
|
||||
format. For example, the previous RPC call, that does not require an
|
||||
input, would display on the standard output : ``{ "balance":
|
||||
"4000000000000" }``. When calling a RPC that requires an input
|
||||
|
@ -3070,7 +3070,7 @@ The language is implemented in OCaml as follows:
|
||||
respects the pre and post stack types declared by the GADT case for
|
||||
each instruction.
|
||||
|
||||
The only things that remain to we reviewed are value dependent
|
||||
The only things that remain to be reviewed are value dependent
|
||||
choices, such as that we did not swap true and false when
|
||||
interpreting the If instruction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user